Bobby  Jindal has a unique problem. He wants to be white. But because a full skin  transplant is not a possibility, Jindal, the governor of Louisiana, America’s  poorest state, has gone to great lengths to attain honorary white status. This  he has achieved by becoming even more conservative than the lily white  Republican Party. However, as a brown convert to ultra right wing  Republicanism, Jindal, the son of Indian-born parents, feels he has to  constantly reaffirm his hard-won white status. This he does by mouthing off  Bible Belt inanities, which no doubt reassures his southern voters and party  bosses that they made the right choice in picking him.
Last  week at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Chicago, Jindal, who’s  being seen as a potential running mate for Republican presidential candidate  Mitt Romney, launched into President Barrack Obama.
He  called Obama “the most liberal, most incompetent president in the White House  since Jimmy Carter”, and accused the US president of cowardice for deciding to  keep away from a recent recall election.
Coming  from a man who governs a state that has been described as “half under water,  half under indictment”, that’s rich.
Jindal’s  obsession 
You  have to understand where he is coming from. At first glance, the governor seems  like any other high-achieving Indian American immigrant. But look closer and  you’ll realise he’s different – in a Sarah Palin creepy kind of way.
Here’s  a quick quiz. If your mother is a nuclear physicist, your father is a civil  engineer, and you have a biology degree from Brown University, what are the  chances of you becoming a card carrying creationist? Answer: smaller than  small. But if you are Bobby Jindal, then the equation changes.
In a  state known for deep-rooted, Third World style corruption, Jindal has been  described as highly ethical. But a better insight into his personality can be  got from observing how he views his own ethnicity, what he feels about his  parents’ culture and his country of origin, and his obsessive desire to be  accepted as a white American in the Republican Party.
Murder?  Not my problem 
Flashback  to March 2008. A series of unexplained deaths of Indian medical and engineering  students culminated in the brutal murders of two Indian PhD scholars at  Louisiana State University.
In the  immediate aftermath of the university attacks, repeated calls were placed to  the newly elected governor by Indians demanding a thorough probe. But strangely  Jindal, who had campaigned vigorously on a platform to crack down on crime, did  nothing. Finally, after nearly a week of silence, he released a tepid statement  through a low level secretary, expressing his condolences and confidence in  local law enforcement in bringing the culprits to justice.
What  was his problem? According to Jindal camp insiders, the governor didn’t want to  make a direct statement about the murdered students – let alone visit the  campus – because he did not want to risk being tarred by the minority brush.
Minorities?  The murder victims were not green card grabbers; they were students, and one of  them was a brilliant doctor who planned to build a hospital back home after his  training at the university.
But  then Jindal has a consistent record of airbrushing anything that clashes with  the image he wants to project to the white Republican voter base.
Take  the July 2009 interview with Morley Safer of 60 Minutes on CBS, where both  Jindal and his wife Supriya gloss over their ethnicity. Safer asks if their  family maintains any of the Indian traditions, and the Jindals look at each  other as if they've been asked if they are hiding illegal aliens in their  basement.
Supriya  tells Safer: “Not too many.” “No, they've been here for so many years that…,”  pipes in Jindal. “We’ve sort of adapted. And we were raised as Americans, you  know? We were raised as Louisianans. So, that's how we live our lives,” Supriya  says with practised ease, but still comes across as unconvincing. Morley Safer  voices over: This oyster and crawfish-eating Louisianan tends to downplay his  ethnic background. “When we sent a reporter and photographer to India to write  about his family and their origins, the Jindal family was very queasy about  that undertaking,” says the editor of the New Orleans Times Picayune, Jim  Amoss.
This  at a time when the US President calls himself Barrack rather than Barry and  openly talks about his Kenyan roots. Also, Obama despite ruling over a country  built largely by British immigrants has never tried to hide his dislike of the  British for their genocide in Kenya. (He reportedly packed off to the British  embassy a bust of Winston Churchill kept in the Oval Office since the 1950s.)  So who’s the coward here?
Jindal’s  disingenuousness drags on. Asked if he felt any racial tension growing up in  Baton Rouge, Jindal tells Safer, “Not at all. You know, this has been a great  place to grow up. The great thing about the people of Louisiana is that they  accept you based on who you are.”
Who is  he fooling? As Safer says, “That’s quite a declaration in a state that not so  long ago gave former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke nearly 40 percent of the vote.  But that sunny, ‘Leave it to Beaver’ optimism is classic Bobby Jindal, a man so  determined to be true blue American, he changed his name.”
I’m  not Peeyoosh 
This  sets up another Jindalism. Safer asks him if he was born “Paiyoosh”. Jindal  (born Piyush) answers in the affirmative with a straight face, not bothering to  correct the CBS journalist that the right way to pronounce his former name is  Peeyoosh.
  But  from where Jindal comes from, that would be like signing his death warrant. He  wants Safer to quickly move away from his ethnicity; he doesn't venture into  that territory any longer.
And  that’s typical Jindal. His jettisoning of his liberal Indian ethos and  conversion to the redneck religion of rustbelt America at an extremely young  age is a clear sign of a person who thinks far ahead and thinks with cold logic.
Culture  critic and opinion writer Jimi Izrael feels Jindal isn’t an Indian American who  just wants to be seen as an American; Jindal is an Indian American who wants to  be white. “Embracing difference makes white folks nervous: any brown person who  aspires to assimilating will get high marks. He channels a certain brand of  sincere self-loathing heretofore only seen in golf caddies and Larry Elder,” he  says. (Larry Elder is a black guy who trashes black guys and thinks he’s white.  He is the author of the book Stupid Black Men. Incidentally, like  Jindal, he studied at Brown University.)
President  Jindal? 
Americans,  especially of the Republican variety, are projecting Jindal as their Great  Beige Hope. Arch-racist and right wing talk show host Rush Limbaugh is so  enamoured of him that he calls Jindal the next Ronald Reagan. But while  Reagan’s appeal cut across party lines, Jindal is a highly polarising figure.  He is at his core an opportunist who appeals to baser American instincts.  Despite coming from an Ivy League family, he wants creationism taught in  schools, and stop stem cell research. His mantra is “God Bless America and No  Place Else”.
This  is the second election year Jindal’s name has been suggested for vice  president. From there, the office of the president is just a step – or  heartbeat – away. If you think that’s unlikely, try and imagine a black  American president before 2008. During the 1970s, stand-up comedians used to  say “President Reagan” to get audiences cracking up. Like Jindal, Reagan was  known for his irrational outbursts in his early political career.
If  Jindal somehow squirms his way to the top, he is likely to introduce  nausea-inducing neocon spin into mainstream American politics that will make  Reagan look like a socialist in comparison.
  -----------
  This article was earlier published at www.indrus.in.
About the author:
    Rakesh Krishnan is a New  Zealand-based writer and a columnist with Russia Beyond the Headlines. His  articles have been used as reference at Rutgers, The State University of New  Jersey; the Centre for Research on Globalization, Canada; Wikipedia; and as  part of the curriculum at the Anthropology Department of the National  University of Ireland, Maynooth.